The Oxford Handbook of Enterprise Ethics gives a complete therapy of the sphere of business ethics as seen from a philosophical method. The media carries stories about Enron officers appearing unethically and concerning the unethical actions of Arthur Andersen or WorldCom, and so on, and most of the people takes this as representative of enterprise ethics or of the necessity for it. What they mean is the necessity for ethics in business.
A story description of enterprise ethics in motion as demonstrated by the corporate’s response to a selected challenge affecting its operations or its business, or by evidence of how moral determination-making is a part of the company’s on a regular basis operations, philosophy and tradition.
Be it the relation of business and politics, be it the role of enterprise in financial inequality, or be it the role of enterprise in new technologies and big knowledge – these are all new ethical challenges which ask for wider and deeper conceptualizations of the position of business and its embeddedness in wider society.
For most of its historical past, and to some degree still immediately, enterprise ethics has been thought-about as a subfield of management that deals with facet-results of enterprise, with fringe occurrences, with phenomena, that perhaps are of interest to the odd practitioner here and there.
Thomas Donaldson’s The Ethics of Enterprise Ethics (New York: Oxford College Press, 1989) was the first systematic remedy of international business ethics, adopted by Richard De George’s Competing with Integrity in Inside Business (New York: Oxford College Press, 1993).